Experience with PyMC3 Bambi package?

Has anyone tried https://github.com/bambinos/bambi for Bayesian analysis of
mixed-effects models?  It looks quite interesting.
I haven't tried Bambi just yet, but the PyMC3 package upon which it is
built has been really quite nice in my experience. The only reason why
I wasn't using PyMC3 more extensively is that it was a pain to
construct the model for complicated GLM(M)s and they only had
convenience functions for constructing non-mixed GLMs.

I will be taking a look soon and will report back!

Best,
Phillip?
Has anyone tried https://github.com/bambinos/bambi for Bayesian
analysis of
mixed-effects models???It looks quite interesting.

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
Tal and I would love to hear thoughts and reactions from anyone and
everyone!

Jake

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Phillip Alday <Phillip.Alday at unisa.edu.au>
wrote:
I haven't tried Bambi just yet, but the PyMC3 package upon which it is
built has been really quite nice in my experience. The only reason why
I wasn't using PyMC3 more extensively is that it was a pain to
construct the model for complicated GLM(M)s and they only had
convenience functions for constructing non-mixed GLMs.

I will be taking a look soon and will report back!

Best,
Phillip

On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 13:50 +0000, Douglas Bates wrote:
Has anyone tried https://github.com/bambinos/bambi for Bayesian
analysis of
mixed-effects models?  It looks quite interesting.

      [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
_______________________________________________
R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models