I computed the school-level and the pupil-level variance like that (as described for 2-level models in MlWin manual): I assumed that my dependent variable is based on a continuous unobserved variable (perfectly valid according to my theoretical model). Therefore, eijk follows a logistic distribution with variance pi2/3=3.29. So,
VPCschool=VARschool/(VARschool+3.29)= 0.17577/(0.17577+3.29)=6.4% and VPCpupil=VPCpupil /(VPCpupil+3.29)=0.19977/(0.19977+3.29)=7.3%.
The reviewers of my paper are not sure if this is the best way to do it. They may reject my paper and I worry because I have spent 3months!!!! writing it. Any ideas to support my method or to use a better one?
Would an IRT model for seven "items" be more to their taste? I don't think the substantive conclusions would be much different. Cheers, David Duffy.
| David Duffy (MBBS PhD) ,-_|\ | email: davidD at qimr.edu.au ph: INT+61+7+3362-0217 fax: -0101 / * | Epidemiology Unit, Queensland Institute of Medical Research \_,-._/ | 300 Herston Rd, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia GPG 4D0B994A v