Skip to content

lme4 with Poisson

4 messages · Douglas Bates, Mitchell Maltenfort, Maciek Jacek Swat +1 more

#
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Lynne Clay <lynne.clay at xtra.co.nz> wrote:
I'm sorry but I know nothing about overdispersion.  To me it is
completely artificial because there is no probability distribution on
which to base a statistical model with these properties.
Sorry but I don't.  I have taken the liberty of sending a copy of this
reply to the R-SIG-Mixed-Models mailing list in the hope that readers
of that list can help you.
#
I think the SabreR package handles overdispersion.

____________________________
Ersatzistician and Chutzpahthologist
I can answer any question.  "I don't know" is an answer. "I don't know
yet" is a better answer.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Douglas Bates <bates at stat.wisc.edu> wrote:
#
Douglas Bates <bates at ...> writes:
It is probably worth checking out http://glmm.wikidot.com/faq ,
which has a variety of suggestions for handling overdispersion in lme4
(via adding observation-level random effect, as you suggest above) and
in other R packages: among other things, there are other packages such
glmmADMB that can fit negative binomial models with random effects.
One of the other responses mentions sabreR: from my brief
web-scrounging (e.g http://sabre.lancs.ac.uk/sabreR_coursebook5.pdf ),
it looks like sabre handles overdispersion by individual-level
random effects as well.

  I might also recommend Zuur et al's book on mixed models.

  Ben Bolker