Skip to content

df numbers in lmer

4 messages · Zofia Prokop, Ben Bolker, Peter Dalgaard +1 more

#
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/10/2011 08:14 AM, Zofia Prokop wrote:
As you may well have seen, this is a giant can of worms.  See for
example <http://glmm.wikidot.com/faq>.  I agree that if you are going to
do this by subtracting 'parameters' from the total number of
observations, you should subtract the number of fixed effect parameters
as well.

  I would guess at 100-20-3 for your df, keeping in mind that this is
going to be approximate.

  Ben Bolker

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk3JOe0ACgkQc5UpGjwzenN6tACcDVSQErDnA0HODI2MW7nLojM4
86kAnR41SgAsO1bEYlLyBpCvUTY6sufr
=b1Ik
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
#
On May 10, 2011, at 15:13 , Ben Bolker wrote:

            
Hm? My guess would be 8... "femcat" contrasts would be tested by averaging over males, leading to effectively 10 females divided into 2 groups and "malecat" vice versa.

How did Pearson's r and the df enter into the effect size issue, however?