Skip to content

Question about GLMER

3 messages · Daniel Jeske, Douglas Bates

#
I am cc:ing the R-SIG-Mixed-Models at R-project.org mailing list on this
reply as such questions are often answered more quickly on that list.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Daniel Jeske <daniel.jeske at ucr.edu> wrote:
The short answer is "no".

The longer answer is that you will need to be more specific about the
form of the data and the model before your question can be answered.
"unstructured" variance-covariance is SAS-speak (and an oxymoron, but
I promise not to rant about that).

So please give us a context.
#
Hi All -

Doug, thanks for your reply.  The context I'm looking at is a Poisson
GLMM with random (intercept,slope) for each subject.  The
variance-covariance matrix is 2x2.  By unstructured, I meant a 3
parameter matrix (sig1^2,sig2^2,sig12), as compared to a (reduced)
alternative diagonal structure.

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: dmbates at gmail.com [mailto:dmbates at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Douglas
Bates
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 1:01 PM
To: Daniel Jeske
Cc: r-help at r-project.org; R-mixed models mailing list
Subject: Re: [R] Question about GLMER


I am cc:ing the R-SIG-Mixed-Models at R-project.org mailing list on this
reply as such questions are often answered more quickly on that list.

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Daniel Jeske <daniel.jeske at ucr.edu>
wrote:
The short answer is "no".

The longer answer is that you will need to be more specific about the
form of the data and the model before your question can be answered.
"unstructured" variance-covariance is SAS-speak (and an oxymoron, but I
promise not to rant about that).

So please give us a context.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 

23:34:00
#
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Daniel Jeske <daniel.jeske at ucr.edu> wrote:
I thought that might be what you were doing. Look at the fm1 and fm2 from

example(lmer)

fm1 allows for correlation of the random effects within subject.  fm2 doesn't.