Skip to content
Prev 331 / 523 Next

[RsR] minimum sample size for the robust counterpart of the t-test #2

When dealing with M-estimators and the goal is to compute confidence intervals, one thing you have to be careful about is skewed distributions. Have not encountered any non-bootstrap method that performs well in simulations where the confidence interval is based on an estimate of the standard error. Just how symmetric the distribution must be seems unclear. What works better is a percentile bootstrap method, even with fairly small sample sizes. This is why the methods in my book focus on bootstrap techniques when dealing with M-estimators.


However, have not yet seen the Koller and Stahel paper. Maybe this problem has been addressed.

Rand

Rand Wilcox
Professor
Dept of Psychology
USC
Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061

FAX: 213-746-9082
For information about statistics books and software, see http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~rwilcox/
as well as
http://college.usc.edu/labs/rwilcox/home

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Friedman <friedman at cancercenter.columbia.edu>
Date: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:02 am
Subject: Re: [RsR] minimum sample size for the robust counterpart of the t-test #2
To: Rand Wilcox <rwilcox at usc.edu>, r-sig-robust at r-project.org