Message-ID: <20071117182620.GK298@lubyanka.local>
Date: 2007-11-17T18:26:20Z
From: Ajay Shah
Subject: [RsR] R-SIG-Robust Digest, Vol 20, Issue 2
In-Reply-To: <mailman.5.1195038002.3734.r-sig-robust@r-project.org>
> First, several books that discuss R and have mentioned robust methods
> (Crawley, 2007; Faraway, 2005; Fox, 2002; Jureckova & Picek, 2006) have
> used the rlm function in the MASS library. Do you have any idea why
> these books would recommend rlm over lmRob? I don?t find the output to
> be as helpful as lmRob?s output. Well, this is just curiosity.
Jennifer had asked this question a few days ago, and I'm also curious
about the answer. (Or, did someone answer this and I missed it?)
--
Ajay Shah http://www.mayin.org/ajayshah
ajayshah at mayin.org http://ajayshahblog.blogspot.com
<*(:-? - wizard who doesn't know the answer.