On 28/11/2015, at 00:00, Drew Tyre <atyre2 at unl.edu> wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:33:40 +0000
From: Drew Tyre <atyre2 at unl.edu>
To: "Granaas, Michael" <Michael.Granaas at usd.edu>, R-sig-teaching
<r-sig-teaching at r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [R-sig-teaching] Choice of graphics package
Message-ID:
<BN1PR08MB153C8E79AF275AB9EAEB45B9E040 at BN1PR08MB153.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
I use R to teach graduate students in the life sciences (mostly ecology but branching out). So far I show students both lattice and base graphics. I like lattice graphics for exploration because of the ease of faceting plots. I use base graphics for "production plots" because I find it easier to tell people how to add things to a base plot (multiple lines etc). To do that effectively with lattice graphics you have to learn how to write panel functions, and that can be a mind bending experience (it was/is for me).
I have not developed the facility with ggplot that I have with base graphics, so I can't comment on it. I think if one comes to truly understand the ggplot model it will be better/faster/easier than either base or lattice graphics, but it's a new model. I don't know which will be easier to teach to students hitting it "cold". I'd be interested in hearing from people that have tried teaching ggplot to students with no prior expeRience.
--
Drew Tyre
School of Natural Resources
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
416 Hardin Hall, East Campus
3310 Holdrege Street
Lincoln, NE 68583-0974
phone: +1 402 472 4054
fax: +1 402 472 2946
email: atyre2 at unl.edu
http://snr.unl.edu/tyre
http://aminpractice.blogspot.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/atiretoo