Skip to content
Prev 172 / 197 Next

[OGRUG] Security considerations for R

Abdool,

I would be very happy to chat a bit more about some of the security
considerations we went through in getting set up directly if you are
interested in discussing further.

With respect to the government context, we followed and are following all
relevant policies and procedures and feel that the risk is manageable, as
does the US FDA : https://www.r-project.org/doc/R-FDA.pdf
https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/useR-international-R-User-conference/useR2016/Using-R-in-a-regulatory-environment-FDA-experiences

Daniel Buijs
On Aug 10, 2016 6:01 AM, <r-ug-ottawa-request at r-project.org> wrote:
Send R-UG-Ottawa mailing list submissions to
        r-ug-ottawa at r-project.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-ug-ottawa
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        r-ug-ottawa-request at r-project.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        r-ug-ottawa-owner at r-project.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of R-UG-Ottawa digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: " departments are concerned about security" [Forked from:
      "Centres of ExpeRtise within GOC"] (Abdool Yasseen)
   2. Re: " departments are concerned about security" [Forked from:
      "Centres of ExpeRtise within GOC"] (Joseph Potvin)
   3. Re: " departments are concerned about security" (Tyler Smith)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:28:42 -0400
From: Abdool Yasseen <abdool.yasseen at gmail.com>
To: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin at xalgorithms.org>
Cc: r-ug-ottawa at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [OGRUG] " departments are concerned about security"
        [Forked from: "Centres of ExpeRtise within GOC"]
Message-ID:
        <CAB0Xbde=BOHx-VHP7jx30o76eyE6V7t+Wd-OAFtwEwS39PngOw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Good to know, and glad others have looked into this further, and developed
documentation.
Still, I can imagine how this issue may make a few directors nervous.


Abdool
On 9 August 2016 at 16:19, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin at xalgorithms.org> wrote:

            
like
would
Anton
Berra
--
*Abdool S. Yasseen III PhD(c)*
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
__________________________________________________________________
"A powerful will can cure, where doubt will end in failure" :  Franz Anton
Mesmer
"It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future" : Yogi Berra




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:45:54 -0400
From: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin at xalgorithms.org>
To: Abdool Yasseen <abdool.yasseen at gmail.com>
Cc: r-ug-ottawa at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [OGRUG] " departments are concerned about security"
        [Forked from: "Centres of ExpeRtise within GOC"]
Message-ID:
        <CAAuWHCJUT==NvHrJbpS83OJhYxLJdTwnjh1ZD391cK--dtQdcQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

RE: "this issue may make a few directors nervous"

Yup. And they should be much more nervous when they are not allowed to
independently validate the integrity of software that GC and Canadians
depend upon. (Unfortunately, many rely on supplier marketing materials,
confident proposal text, and f2f meetings with suppliers.)

Here's another "oldie" (from 1999): this one is an explanation for a
Washington State Dept of Transportation office about why bridge engineering
software ought to be fre/libre/open:
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/eesc/bridge/alternateroute/about.htm


Joseph Potvin
Executive Director, Xalgorithms Foundation
Mobile: 819-593-5983
jpotvin at xalgorithms.org
https://www.xalgorithms.org

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Abdool Yasseen <abdool.yasseen at gmail.com>
wrote:
to
support
based
institution
------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:08:02 -0400
From: Tyler Smith <tyler at plantarum.ca>
To: r-ug-ottawa at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [OGRUG] " departments are concerned about security"
Message-ID:
        <1470776882.1198746.690699377.12CD4E4D at webmail.messagingengine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016, Abdool Yasseen wrote:
institution
They may be nervous, but this is due in large part to conflating the
concepts of freeware and Free Software.

Freeware is typically a binary executable of unknown provenance, and
frequently contains malware. The developers are unknown, and there is
little risk to them if their program does bad things to the users'
computers.

Free Software is software for which the source code is available, and
typically is developed in an open and transparent way. In many cases
(including R), the developers are well-known and respected domain
experts. While it's unlikely an average R user has the time or expertise
to validate the security of the code they use, there are many expert
users that do. Furthermore, the domain experts behind it would risk
their reputations and careers should they engage in anything nefarious.

It would be possible to use R as an infection vector, but the effort
required to entice a naive user into running malicious R code would be
far greater, and the target group far smaller, than a standard phishing
email scam. On the other hand, there are many serious benefits to using
Free Software, some of which are detailed in the links Joseph provided.

Best,

Tyler



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
R-UG-Ottawa mailing list
R-UG-Ottawa at r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-ug-ottawa

------------------------------

End of R-UG-Ottawa Digest, Vol 40, Issue 3
******************************************
Message-ID: <CAFVA2rKJTjunL04PTnLcy_MFQwuABEoaZ+COLu1NtDBTHnmFOw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFVA2r+Y4pKa=EdCecHpM2gFPWytGCC-RK5qzNmomFEPBkbrcQ@mail.gmail.com>