[Rcpp-devel] Bug report: need to wrap return of sugar functions
On 15 August 2011 at 08:36, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 15 August 2011 at 22:11, Darren Cook wrote:
| | > | more minimal examples than the below, but as this is the one from | | > | Rcpp-sugar.pdf I thought it most convincing: | | > | ... | | > No bug. | | > | | > We never said that you could get by an _implicit_ wrap everywhere. Sometimes | | > you do need an explicit wrap. This is just one of these situations. | | | | Thanks for the reply. | | In that case I'm reporting a bug in the documentation :-) | | Sigh. | | _What_ file? _What_ paragraph? _What_ is your suggested fix? To close this, Darren filled me in off-list and there was indeed a Rcpp::wrap() call missing in an early example in the Rcpp-sugar vignette. Now corrected, with a tip-of-the-hat to Darren. Dirk
Two new Rcpp master classes for R and C++ integration scheduled for New York (Sep 24) and San Francisco (Oct 8), more details are at http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2011/08/04#rcpp_classes_2011-09_and_2011-10 http://www.revolutionanalytics.com/products/training/public/rcpp-master-class.php