[Rcpp-devel] Rcpp code in my package causes the R process to crash on fedora-clang
FWIW, I have the same problem, which is what I reported here: https://github.com/RcppCore/Rcpp/issues/972#issuecomment-593291723 I haven't been able to solve it because I can't reproduce it (I don't have a Mac, and the Docker container with that R setup doesn't fail). In my case, it could be that the exception pointer ends up being null, like in this unrelated issue I found: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/38141 But until I get access to a Mac, I won't be sure. Regards, Alexis.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, 18:41 Venelin Mitov <vmitov at gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for your quick response, Dirk! Concise and informative as usual. Best, Venelin Am So., 22. März 2020 um 17:57 Uhr schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel < edd at debian.org>:
On 22 March 2020 at 17:30, Venelin Mitov wrote: | 3. The line of code that is causing a segfault error and a crash of | the R-process is a call to the | std::logic_error() constructor. This line of code is found in the
package's file
| src/QuadraticPoly.h: | | throw logic_error(oss.str()); I always recommend to Rcpp::stop() which I use extensively and almost
exclusively.
| 4. However, throwing the above exception is correct - the | exception is intercepted (caught) at a higher functional level of the | PCMBaseCpp package, where it is handled. The same line of code is | executed without problem on all other flavours. | | 5. Hence, my question is why std::logic_error(oss.str()) is | throwing a memory allocation exception on this specific CRAN flavour? I have no idea. But excception handling is genuinely complicated. Feel free to peruse
the old
issue ticket and pull request discussions at the Rcpp repo at GitHub --
there
is lots of it. | I couldn't find anywhere in the R extension manual a text stating that | it is illegal to create std::logic_error objects in C++ code. The You missed that (at least parts of) R Core does not want us to use C++
in the
first place -- or that is how one could read the (still somewhat "controversial" blog post [1]). | fact that the same code is passing on all other flavours including | rhub's fedora-clang suggests that this might be a local problem in the | fedora-clang test environment on CRAN. | | Any advice on how I should proceed to prevent the package getting | removed from CRAN? Just because "it should work in theory" simply does not mean it will in practice. If a CRAN test machine consistently shows errors, I most
often try
to change my code [2]. You could at least try that. A sad aspect in all this also is that we have no publically accessible machine behaving exactly like that Fedora box. | For you information, here is the stacktrace generated using gdb: No there wasn't. Standard GNU mailman mailing list setup so attachments are stripped. Dirk [1]
[2] There are exceptions. I think the errors against anytime are a setup issue at their end as it genuinely happens nowhere else. -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
-- Venelin MITOV
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/attachments/20200323/4b0f4a6e/attachment-0001.html>