[Rcpp-devel] Rcpp on R 2.12.0 / windows / gcc 4.5

On 30.09.2010 21:46, Romain Francois wrote:

If I replace unit tests with this simple one:


test.dummy2 <- function(){
fx <- cxxfunction( , 'return R_NilValue ; ', plugin = "Rcpp", verbose =
TRUE )
fx()
}

I get this problem:

Executing test function test.dummy2 ... >> setting environment variables:
PKG_LIBS =
C:/Users/romain/svn/rcpp/pkg/Rcpp.Rcheck/Rcpp/lib/x64/libRcpp.a

LinkingTo : Rcpp

CLINK_CPPFLAGS =
-I"C:/Users/romain/svn/rcpp/pkg/Rcpp.Rcheck/Rcpp/include"

Program source :

1 : // includes from the plugin
2 :
3 : #include <Rcpp.h>
4 :
5 :
6 : #ifndef BEGIN_RCPP
7 : #define BEGIN_RCPP
8 : #endif
9 :
10 : #ifndef END_RCPP
11 : #define END_RCPP
12 : #endif
13 :
14 : using namespace Rcpp;
15 :
16 :
17 : // user includes
18 :
19 :
20 : // declaration
21 : extern "C" {
22 : SEXP file652d570b( ) ;
23 : }
24 :
25 : // definition
26 :
27 : SEXP file652d570b( ){
28 : BEGIN_RCPP
29 : return R_NilValue ;
30 : END_RCPP
31 : }
32 :
33 :
Compilation argument:
c:\R\R-212~1.0AL/bin/x64/R CMD SHLIB file652d570b.cpp 2>
file652d570b.cpp.err.txt
g++ -I"c:/R/R-212~1.0AL/include"
-I"C:/Users/romain/svn/rcpp/pkg/Rcpp.Rcheck/Rcpp/include" -O2 -Wall -c
file652d570b.cpp -o file652d570b.o
g++ -shared -s -static-libgcc -o file652d570b.dll tmp.def file652d570b.o
C:/Users/romain/svn/rcpp/pkg/Rcpp.Rcheck/Rcpp/lib/x64/libRcpp.a
-Lc:/R/R-212~1.0AL/bin/i386 -lR
Timing stopped at: 0 0.02 2.41
Error in inDL(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now), ...) :
unable to load shared object
'C:/Users/romain/AppData/Local/Temp/Rtmp5Bzbzb/file652d570b.dll':
LoadLibrary failure: %1 n?est pas une application Win32 valide.

No surprise:

You mixed 64-bit R (called from bin/x64) with 32-bit gcc (gcc without
prefix)...
I guess you used the wrong path to the R executable and got the wrong one?

Uwe

If I run this from R --arch 64 it works fine:




$ R --arch 64

R version 2.12.0 alpha (2010-09-29 r53067)
Copyright (C) 2010 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
Platform: x86_64-pc-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)

R est un logiciel libre livr? sans AUCUNE GARANTIE.
Vous pouvez le redistribuer sous certaines conditions.
Tapez 'license()' ou 'licence()' pour plus de d?tails.

R est un projet collaboratif avec de nombreux contributeurs.
Tapez 'contributors()' pour plus d'information et
'citation()' pour la fa?on de le citer dans les publications.

Tapez 'demo()' pour des d?monstrations, 'help()' pour l'aide
en ligne ou 'help.start()' pour obtenir l'aide au format HTML.
Tapez 'q()' pour quitter R.

fx <- cxxfunction( , 'return R_NilValue ; ', plugin = "Rcpp", verbose

= TRUE$
Erreur : impossible de trouver la fonction "cxxfunction"

fx()

Erreur : impossible de trouver la fonction "fx"

require( Rcpp )

Le chargement a n?cessit? le package : Rcpp

require( inline )

Le chargement a n?cessit? le package : inline

fx <- cxxfunction( , 'return R_NilValue ; ', plugin = "Rcpp", verbose

= TRUE$

setting environment variables:

PKG_LIBS = c:/R/R-2.12.0alpha/library/Rcpp/lib/x64/libRcpp.a

LinkingTo : Rcpp

CLINK_CPPFLAGS = -I"c:/R/R-2.12.0alpha/library/Rcpp/include"

Program source :

1 : // includes from the plugin
2 :
3 : #include <Rcpp.h>
4 :
5 :
6 : #ifndef BEGIN_RCPP
7 : #define BEGIN_RCPP
8 : #endif
9 :
10 : #ifndef END_RCPP
11 : #define END_RCPP
12 : #endif
13 :
14 : using namespace Rcpp;
15 :
16 :
17 : // user includes
18 :
19 :
20 : // declaration
21 : extern "C" {
22 : SEXP file14357889( ) ;
23 : }
24 :
25 : // definition
26 :
27 : SEXP file14357889( ){
28 : BEGIN_RCPP
29 : return R_NilValue ;
30 : END_RCPP
31 : }
32 :
33 :
Compilation argument:
c:\R\R-2.12.0alpha/bin/x64/R CMD SHLIB file14357889.cpp 2>
file14357889.cpp.err.txt
x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -I"c:/R/R-212~1.0AL/include"
-I"c:/R/R-2.12.0alpha/library/Rcpp/include" -O2 -Wall -c fil
e14357889.cpp -o file14357889.o
x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -shared -s -static-libgcc -o file14357889.dll
tmp.def file14357889.o c:/R/R-2.12.0alpha/library/R
cpp/lib/x64/libRcpp.a -Lc:/R/R-212~1.0AL/bin/x64 -lR




Not sure what my next move is.

Romain


Le 30/09/10 21:21, Romain Francois a ?crit :

I tried now with the newer R alpha (rev 53067) and I'm afraid I still
get the same errors.


When however I run the tests manually, everything goes fine:


$ R --arch 64

require( Rcpp )
require( inline )
require( RUnit )

# for example

runTestFile( "Rcpp/inst/unitTests/runit.sugar.R" )

Executing test function test.sugar.abs ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.equal ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.greater ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.greater.or.equal ... done
successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.less ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.less.or.equal ... done
successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.not.equal ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.one.equal ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.one.greater ... done
successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.one.greater.or.equal ... done
successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.one.less ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.one.less.or.equal ... done
successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.all.one.not.equal ... done
successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.any.equal ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.any.equal.not ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.any.greater ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.any.greater.or.equal ... done
successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.any.isna ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.any.less ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.any.less.or.equal ... done
successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.any.not.equal ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.assignment ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.beta ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.ceil ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.choose ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.complex ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.constructor ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.diag ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.diff ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.divides ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.exp ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.floor ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.gamma ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.head ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.ifelse ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.isna ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.isna.isna ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.lapply ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.lbeta ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.lchoose ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.log1p ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.matrix.outer ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.matrix.row ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.minus ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.plus ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.plus.all ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.plus.seqlen ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.pmax ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.pmax.one ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.pmin ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.pmin.one ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.pow ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.psigamma ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.Range ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.rep ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.rev ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.sapply ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.sapply.list ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.sapply.rawfun ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.sapply.square ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.seqlaong ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.seqlen ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.sign ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.tail ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.times ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.unary.minus ... done successfully.



Executing test function test.sugar.wrap ... done successfully.

Number of test functions: 67
Number of errors: 0
Number of failures: 0

.Platform

$OS.type
[1] "windows"

$file.sep
[1] "/"

$dynlib.ext
[1] ".dll"

$GUI
[1] "RTerm"

$endian
[1] "little"

$pkgType
[1] "win.binary"

$path.sep
[1] ";"

$r_arch
[1] "x64"


Romain

Le 30/09/10 15:04, Uwe Ligges a ?crit :

On 30.09.2010 14:17, Romain Francois wrote:

Hmm. This failed on win builder.

Dear package maintainer,

this notification has been generated automatically.
Your package Rcpp_0.8.6.3.tar.gz has been built (if working) and
checked for Windows.
Please check the log files and (if working) the binary package at:
http://win-builder.r-project.org/7zee4m5kHIjB
The files will be removed after roughly 72 hours.
Installation time in seconds: 87
Check time in seconds: 2385
Check result: ERROR
R version 2.12.0 alpha (2010-09-27 r53048) (32+64-bit)

I initially tested it with

$ Rscript --arch 64 -e "Rcpp:::test()"

which worked fine.

Brian just said he fixed it. Can you try with the very recent svn from
minutes (or few hours) ago?

Best,
Uwe

R CMD check gives me the same failures as win builder... more work
required then :-(


Le 30/09/10 13:45, Romain Francois a ?crit :

Hello,

I spent some of my time this morning tweaking Rcpp so that it builds
and
checks on the R 2.12.0 alpha (the latest snapshot) on windows with
the
latest Rtools on both archs.

It appears to work fine at the latest svn revision (rev 2259).

I've sent it to the R-devel branch of win builder and posted a
tarball
here: http://addictedtor.free.fr/misc/rcpp/Rcpp_0.8.6.3.tar.gz
I'd appreciate if other people would also try it, I'm always a bit
insecure when it comes to windows.

Our aim is to synchronize release of Rcpp 0.8.7 with the release of R
2.12.0


Issues were:
- the hello function in the module that is part of the testRcppmodule
package:

std::string hello() {
throw std::range_error( "boom" ) ;
}

This makes windows (or gcc 4.5, or something else) unhappy. This is
probably an issue with throw declarations, exceptions accross
translation unites, etc ... as we have seen before. For now, I
commented
it out. This is low priority.

- fast indexing, i.e. as provided by the Rcpp::Fast class makes
windows
unhappy, so I am only using Fast on other platforms. See the #ifndef
WIN32 in the Extractor.h file. This seems like a good enough
workaround
for now. People who want faster indexing on windows are welcome to
submit a (((tested))) patch. Note that this is possible that the
newer
compiler produces better code, so the need for the Rcpp::Fast trick
might not be needed at all.

Romain