Message-ID: <19919.56713.400112.783168@max.nulle.part>
Date: 2011-05-15T14:04:57Z
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Subject: [Rcpp-devel] Rcpp-devel Digest, Vol 19, Issue 10
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimbb-XPKFHdppdPNVnj6KFvMtvrvw@mail.gmail.com>
On 15 May 2011 at 01:43, Christian Gunning wrote:
| On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:46 PM,
| <rcpp-devel-request at r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at> wrote:
| >
| > There is also Davor's trick of getting the C++ function pointer---this avoids
| > the 'going back to R' overhead. ?But it is not really clean to call an API
| > that way if the API decided to close off those access points...
|
| Eh? Haven't seen that before -- where does it live? Let's doc it if it's sane...
As I wrote _in the very next paragraph_ of the email you quote from ;-) :
-- Package rgam on CRAN is one place
-- previous mails here as e.g. Romain's second post in the this thread
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.rcpp/408
Dirk
--
Gauss once played himself in a zero-sum game and won $50.
-- #11 at http://www.gaussfacts.com