R> library(Rcpp) R> ?RcppUnitTests R> is really clever, but the pdf is really dumb. Can we include the .txt file also in the .pdf using Sweave magic? Dirk
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
[Rcpp-devel] Unit tests
3 messages · Dirk Eddelbuettel, Romain Francois
On 01/04/2010 04:29 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
R> library(Rcpp) R> ?RcppUnitTests R> is really clever, but the pdf is really dumb. Can we include the .txt file also in the .pdf using Sweave magic? Dirk
Not sure this does the trick. I've moved the logic back into the Rd file. If I do : > options( help_type = "pdf" ) > ?RcppUnitTests The pdf file that gets generated contains the txt report Romain
Romain Francois Professional R Enthusiast +33(0) 6 28 91 30 30 http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr |- http://tr.im/IW9B : C++ exceptions at the R level |- http://tr.im/IlMh : CPP package: exposing C++ objects `- http://tr.im/HlX9 : new package : bibtex
On 4 January 2010 at 21:58, Romain Fran?ois wrote:
| On 01/04/2010 04:29 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > R> library(Rcpp)
| > R> ?RcppUnitTests
| > R>
| >
| > is really clever, but the pdf is really dumb. Can we include the .txt file
| > also in the .pdf using Sweave magic?
| >
| > Dirk
|
| Not sure this does the trick. I've moved the logic back into the Rd file.
|
| If I do :
|
| > options( help_type = "pdf" )
| > ?RcppUnitTests
|
| The pdf file that gets generated contains the txt report
I think you just shifted the debate -- vignette("Rcpp-unitTests") is still
empty and silly vignette. What shall we about it?
Dirk
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.