On 29 March 2013 at 16:20, romain at r-enthusiasts.com wrote:
| Cool. I'll have a look when I'm back from easter weekend.
Sounds good.
And that point, it would be really nice if you could also restore the ability
to build Rcpp, which appears to have broken with your Data.Frame patch.
Details are below.
Dirk
edd at max:~/svn/rcpp/pkg$ R CMD build Rcpp
* checking for file ?Rcpp/DESCRIPTION? ... OK
* preparing ?Rcpp?:
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* cleaning src
* running ?cleanup?
* installing the package to process help pages
-----------------------------------
* installing *source* package ?Rcpp? ...
** libs
ccache g++-4.7 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I../inst/include/ -fpic -g0 -O3 -Wall -pipe -Wno-variadic-macros -pedantic -c Date.cpp -o Date.o
ccache g++-4.7 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I../inst/include/ -fpic -g0 -O3 -Wall -pipe -Wno-variadic-macros -pedantic -c Module.cpp -o Module.o
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:102:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h: In instantiation of ?Rcpp::traits::named_object<SEXPREC*> Rcpp::Argument::operator=(const T&) [with T = int]?:
Module.cpp:40:128: required from here
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h:34:52: error: ?wrap? was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:117:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h:902:13: note: ?template<class InputIterator> SEXPREC* Rcpp::wrap(InputIterator, InputIterator)? declared here, later in the translation unit
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:102:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h: In instantiation of ?Rcpp::traits::named_object<SEXPREC*> Rcpp::Argument::operator=(const T&) [with T = char [5]]?:
Module.cpp:40:146: required from here
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h:34:52: error: ?wrap? was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:117:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h:902:13: note: ?template<class InputIterator> SEXPREC* Rcpp::wrap(InputIterator, InputIterator)? declared here, later in the translation unit
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:102:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h: In instantiation of ?Rcpp::traits::named_object<SEXPREC*> Rcpp::Argument::operator=(const T&) [with T = char [12]]?:
Module.cpp:52:127: required from here
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h:34:52: error: ?wrap? was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:117:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h:902:13: note: ?template<class InputIterator> SEXPREC* Rcpp::wrap(InputIterator, InputIterator)? declared here, later in the translation unit
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:102:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h: In instantiation of ?Rcpp::traits::named_object<SEXPREC*> Rcpp::Argument::operator=(const T&) [with T = char [15]]?:
Module.cpp:61:133: required from here
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h:34:52: error: ?wrap? was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:117:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h:902:13: note: ?template<class InputIterator> SEXPREC* Rcpp::wrap(InputIterator, InputIterator)? declared here, later in the translation unit
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:102:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h: In instantiation of ?Rcpp::traits::named_object<SEXPREC*> Rcpp::Argument::operator=(const T&) [with T = char [22]]?:
Module.cpp:67:133: required from here
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h:34:52: error: ?wrap? was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:117:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h:902:13: note: ?template<class InputIterator> SEXPREC* Rcpp::wrap(InputIterator, InputIterator)? declared here, later in the translation unit
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:102:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h: In instantiation of ?Rcpp::traits::named_object<SEXPREC*> Rcpp::Argument::operator=(const T&) [with T = char [11]]?:
Module.cpp:73:142: required from here
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h:34:52: error: ?wrap? was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:117:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h:902:13: note: ?template<class InputIterator> SEXPREC* Rcpp::wrap(InputIterator, InputIterator)? declared here, later in the translation unit
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:102:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h: In instantiation of ?Rcpp::traits::named_object<SEXPREC*> Rcpp::Argument::operator=(const T&) [with T = char [20]]?:
Module.cpp:77:139: required from here
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h:34:52: error: ?wrap? was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:117:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h:902:13: note: ?template<class InputIterator> SEXPREC* Rcpp::wrap(InputIterator, InputIterator)? declared here, later in the translation unit
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:102:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h: In instantiation of ?Rcpp::traits::named_object<SEXPREC*> Rcpp::Argument::operator=(const T&) [with T = SEXPREC*]?:
Module.cpp:265:50: required from here
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h:34:52: error: ?wrap? was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:117:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h:902:13: note: ?template<class InputIterator> SEXPREC* Rcpp::wrap(InputIterator, InputIterator)? declared here, later in the translation unit
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:102:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h: In instantiation of ?Rcpp::traits::named_object<SEXPREC*> Rcpp::Argument::operator=(const T&) [with T = bool]?:
Module.cpp:266:39: required from here
../inst/include/Rcpp/Named.h:34:52: error: ?wrap? was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
In file included from ../inst/include/RcppCommon.h:117:0,
from ../inst/include/Rcpp.h:27,
from Module.cpp:22:
../inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h:902:13: note: ?template<class InputIterator> SEXPREC* Rcpp::wrap(InputIterator, InputIterator)? declared here, later in the translation unit
make: *** [Module.o] Error 1
ERROR: compilation failed for package ?Rcpp?
* removing ?/tmp/RtmpfejSO9/Rinst312b332a9a19/Rcpp?
-----------------------------------
ERROR: package installation failed
edd at max:~/svn/rcpp/pkg$
|
| Romain
|
| Le 2013-03-29 16:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel a ?crit?:
| > On 29 March 2013 at 09:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > |
| > | On 29 March 2013 at 15:24, romain at r-enthusiasts.com wrote:
| > | | Le 2013-03-29 14:31, Dirk Eddelbuettel a ?crit?:
| > | | > On 29 March 2013 at 09:11, romain at r-enthusiasts.com wrote:
| > | | > |
| > | | > | Hello,
| > | | > |
| > | | > | This is related to this change:
| > | | > |
| > | | > | 2013-01-15 Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>
| > | | > |
| > | | > | * src/api.cpp (Rcpp): Commented-out coerce_to_string() for
| > real
| > | | > and
| > | | > | complex arguments as R-devel (as of today) dislikes use of
| > non-API
| > | | > | functions Rf_EncodeComplex?, ?Rf_EncodeReal?,
| > ?Rf_formatComplex?
| > | | > |
| > | | > | So maybe Dirk has a plan to fix it.
| > | | >
| > | | > I do not.
| > | |
| > | | Fine. So I'll fix it.
| > |
| > | Hold on.
| > |
| > | I am in the middle of it. I do have a poor replacementment for
| > EncodeReal,
| > | and am about to test one for complex. Will post soon.
| > |
| > | Am not covering scientific notation at this point.
| >
| > Ok, here replacement candidates. Kudos to Kevin for sending
| > something
| > reproducible that triggered this. This snipped below grew from his
| > code and
| > provids replacement candidates for coerce_to_string() for the real
| > and
| > complex cases, not using the internal R functions (which I also did
| > not look
| > at). Obviously the function headers need to change from the sample
| > to what
| > api.cpp uses.
| >
| > What we get is simple snprintf() calls which almost surely is less
| > featureful
| > than what R has, but please complaon to R Core about the sillyness of
| > us not
| > being able to use _existing and tested functions_. It's painful.
| >
| >
| > Dirk
| >
| > #include <Rcpp.h>
| >
| > static const char* dropTrailing0(char *s, char cdec) {
| > /* Note that 's' is modified */
| > char *p = s;
| > for (p = s; *p; p++) {
| > if(*p == cdec) {
| > char *replace = p++;
| > while ('0' <= *p && *p <= '9')
| > if(*(p++) != '0')
| > replace = p;
| > if(replace != p)
| > while((*(replace++) = *(p++)))
| > ;
| > break;
| > }
| > }
| > return s;
| > }
| >
| > //template <>
| > // const char* coerce_to_string/*<REALSXP>*/(double x){
| > // [[Rcpp::export]]
| > const char* coerce_to_stringRE(double x){
| > int w,d,e ;
| > // cf src/main/format.c in R's sources:
| > // The return values are
| > // w : the required field width
| > // d : use %w.df in fixed format, %#w.de in scientific format
| > // e : use scientific format if != 0, value is number of exp
| > digits - 1
| > //
| > // nsmall specifies the minimum number of decimal digits in
| > fixed format:
| > // it is 0 except when called from do_format.
| > Rf_formatReal( &x, 1, &w, &d, &e, 0 ) ;
| > // we are no longer allowed to use this:
| > // char* tmp = const_cast<char*>( Rf_EncodeReal(x, w, d, e,
| > '.') );
| > // so approximate it poorly as
| > char tmp[128];
| > snprintf(tmp, 127, "%*.*f", w, d, x);
| > //Rcpp::Rcout << "Vec is " << vec << std::endl;
| > return dropTrailing0(tmp, '.');
| >
| > }
| >
| > //template <>
| > //const char* coerce_to_string/*<CPLXSXP>*/(Rcomplex x){
| > // [[Rcpp::export]]
| > std::string coerce_to_stringCP(Rcomplex x){
| > int wr, dr, er, wi, di, ei;
| > // cf src/main/format.c in R's sources:
| > Rf_formatComplex(&x, 1, &wr, &dr, &er, &wi, &di, &ei, 0);
| > //return Rf_EncodeComplex(x, wr, dr, er, wi, di, ei, '.' );
| >
| > // we are no longer allowed to use this:
| > // Rf_EncodeComplex(x, wr, dr, er, wi, di, ei, '.' );
| > // so approximate it poorly as
| > char tmp[128];
| > snprintf(tmp, 127, "%*.*f+%*.*fi", wr, dr, x.r, wi, di, x.i);
| > return std::string(tmp); // force a copy
| > }
| >
| > using namespace Rcpp;
| >
| > // // [[Rcpp::export]]
| > // IntegerVector counts(NumericVector x) {
| > // return table(x);
| > // }
|