>On 11/10/2009 12:23 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 10 November 2009 at 09:47, Romain Fran?ois wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Would it make sense to have an rout and rerr so that we could do :
|
| rout<< "bla bla"<< endl ;
|
| and
|
| rerr<< "bla bla"<< endl ;
|
| and this would go into Rprintf and REprintf ? or maybe we can directly
| redefine cout and cerr
Hm. That never really arose in my use. cout was mostly for debugging.
I think a C++-ish way is to create<< operators (that eg RcppDate and
RcppDatetime have).
Where you thinking of something other than debugging help?
|Not really, but just sort of making sure debugging is consistent with
|the recommendation from WRE of using Rprintf instead of printf
Has anyone followed up on this? I?m wondering if there might be a simple way
to redirect cerr and cout to something like an rerr and rout? I for one have
thousands of lines of code that use cerr and cout in libraries that I would
like to use in R. It seems that they currently are causing a crash at run-time
when I leave those lines in my packages. I won?t know for sure until I take
the time to remove all of them, but who knows how long that might take. I
think it would probably be faster and easier for me to redirect these streams
to R somehow. Has that been worked out yet? If so, how? If not, I think maybe
I can redirect them to some log files or something. Has anyone done that?
Thanks,
Sean