I'm on my project developing user interface for r. I dicided to use rinside. And i want to know which is better in term of peformance, RInside or statconndcom ? For the reason why using RInside is better than statconndcom. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/attachments/20150405/86372322/attachment.html>
[Rcpp-devel] RInside vs Statconndcom
4 messages · Jodi Jhouranda Siregar, Romain Francois, Dirk Eddelbuettel +1 more
RInside is not really about performance. it?s just a way to easily embed R in a C++ application.
Le 4 avr. 2015 ? 19:54, Jodi Jhouranda Siregar <11.6729 at stis.ac.id> a ?crit : I'm on my project developing user interface for r. I dicided to use rinside. And i want to know which is better in term of peformance, RInside or statconndcom ? For the reason why using RInside is better than statconndcom. Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/pipermail/rcpp-devel/attachments/20150404/54e7205e/attachment.html>
On 5 April 2015 at 00:54, Jodi Jhouranda Siregar wrote:
| I'm on my project developing user interface for r. I dicided to use rinside. | And i want to know which is better in term of peformance, RInside or | statconndcom ? For the reason why using RInside is better than statconndcom. Not a well-posed question. You only want statconndcom if some (local) reason you must live in a Windows stack. Your app will not be portable, so choose carefully. RInside pretty works everywhere but requires the same compiler you use for R. It is pretty well-tested and mature. Dirk
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
2 days later
Hello Jodi,
What Dirk told you it's very important to decide. Moreover I have been using both solutions.
I started to use "statconndcom" because windows requirements. Finally I have been able to remove (or avoid by using "remote" debian server and google protocol buffers messaging) windows requirements and I use RInside (also with MPI on multicore or cluster). I haven't complete a serious benchmark, but I "feel" it performs much faster that when I use to use C# and "statconndcom".
Regards
David Ibarra G?mez
Jefe de Proyectos
Direcci?n de Ingenier?a de Sistemas
Aqualogy Aqua Ambiente
dibarra at aquology.net
-----Mensaje original-----
De: rcpp-devel-bounces at lists.r-forge.r-project.org [mailto:rcpp-devel-bounces at lists.r-forge.r-project.org] En nombre de Dirk Eddelbuettel
Enviado el: s?bado, 04 de abril de 2015 20:46
Para: Jodi Jhouranda Siregar
CC: rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org
Asunto: Re: [Rcpp-devel] RInside vs Statconndcom
On 5 April 2015 at 00:54, Jodi Jhouranda Siregar wrote:
| I'm on my project developing user interface for r. I dicided to use rinside. | And i want to know which is better in term of peformance, RInside or | statconndcom ? For the reason why using RInside is better than statconndcom. Not a well-posed question. You only want statconndcom if some (local) reason you must live in a Windows stack. Your app will not be portable, so choose carefully. RInside pretty works everywhere but requires the same compiler you use for R. It is pretty well-tested and mature. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel at lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel Disclaimer: http://disclaimer.aqualogy.net/