Search Archives

Hi Baptiste, Thanks for the bug report. I'll take a look at the underlying issues. On 31 May 2011 09:48, baptiste auguie <baptiste.auguie at googlemail.com> wrote: > Sorry, I had too many spaces in the vectors. The...

On 30 May 2011, Terrance Savitsky wrote: > Hello, After upgrading to the 0.2.21 release of RcppArmadillo, my > previously working code (across many functions) ceased working (on a > Windows XP installation). I re-installed the previous version (0.2...

Hi everyone, I've just released Armadillo 1.99.5, which is likely to get wrapped up in the next release of RcppArmadillo. See http://arma.sourceforge.net/ The 1.99.x series are beta releases for the upcoming 2...

Hi Baptise & Terrance, I've fixed several issues in Armadillo and released an updated version (1.99.4). Dirk has wrapped it up in RcppArmadillo 0.2.22, which should be hitting the mirrors soon. Could you try your code...

For tiny matrices (ie. <= 4x4), Armadillo by default uses fast algorithms for det(), inv() and solve(). In rare instances these fast algorithms may not be as precise as the standard algorithms found in Lapack. As such, in the updated version...

On 31 May 2011 05:02, Savitsky, Terrance <savitsky at rand.org> wrote: > Dr. Sanderson, I've been able to verify that my issue resides in the > inv() function (that I typically apply to small p x p matrices, where...

I've found the cause of the issue (involves handling of small matrices). The fix is easy (and already done in the SVN repo), but I currently don't have the time to roll out another release. I'll aim...

I believe this is an issue in Clang, not Armadillo. There is another problem with Clang: it tends to be overly picky, to the point of doing implicit template instantiations (where no instantiation was requested!). The over-pickiness broke the...