Search Archives

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-hpc/attachments/20101203/74502e10/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mac/attachments/20130226/5c420820/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20140119/4d2d3bc7/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-hpc/attachments/20140109/372bec13/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20130222/b7f80993/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20130225/0786b825/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20130225/89b46db4/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/attachments/20140105/066d7c3d/attachment.pl>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mac/attachments/20130412/2dddfaef/attachment.pl>

On September 17, 2010 07:42:35 am Lovett, Mitch wrote: > I am running 10.6.4 on a (few weeks old) 12 core Mac Pro. And what version of gcc? Davor

On 2010-07-15, at 11:37 AM, Davor Cubranic wrote: > I'm now going to try the most recent release of Armadillo (0.9.52) to see if the error is still there. Yep, still there.

On 2012-07-10, at 9:26 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | Is my compiler not compatible with RcppArmadillo? Let me know your > | thoughts, thanks! > > It would help us somewhat if you could let us know which compiler that is, eg...

On October 17, 2011 02:34:27 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > If none of this is any help, please try respecifying your question. I am a > little unclear what "call back the R commands in 'cxxfunction'" is asking > about. This...

On July 5, 2011 04:59:16 PM Hadley Wickham wrote: > That's not a syntactically valid name - you use backticks to refer to > names that are not syntactically valid. I was too loose in my terminology: I meant that...

On 2010-06-11, at 6:39 AM, <romain at r-enthusiasts.com> <romain at r-enthusiasts.com> wrote: > I added some experimental code in Rcpp to allow this: > > code <- ' > NumericVector xx(x) ; > NumericVector ll(lowerBd) ; > > return any( xx < ll...

On 03/26/2011 12:19 PM, Ben Bolker wrote: > ["Namespace dependency not required: lme4a"] > I think "dependence" works better than "dependency" in English, too I'm not a native English speaker, but "dependency" is a pretty standard software engineering...

On 2010-03-26, at 5:18 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 26 March 2010 at 07:44, Romain Francois wrote: > | I believe this could help people implement other graphics devices using > | c++ idioms. > > Are there such people? ;-) I don...

On November 14, 2010 08:11:02 am Ted Rosenbaum wrote: > Hi, > When trying to install gputools on Ubuntu 10.10 I obtain the > following error message. > > classification.cu(735): error: argument of type "unsigned int *" is > incompatible with parameter...

On 12-10-19 02:28 PM, Paul Hewson wrote: > As I say, I think I've tracked the symlink itself as well as the > files it links to /usr/bin/R is itself a symlink to R64. All three...

On June 30, 2011 01:37:57 PM Hadley Wickham wrote: > Is there any easy way to tell if a string is a syntactically valid name? [...] > > One implementation would be: > > is.syntactic <- function(x) x == make.names(x) > > but I...