Search Archives
Search tips
from:Name
Search by author name, e.g. from:Duncan Murdoch
"exact phrase"
Match an exact phrase
word1 word2
Match messages containing both words
Date range
Use the date pickers to filter results to a time period
Use the list dropdown to narrow results to a specific mailing list. Combine from: with other terms to filter by author and content.
I run the example with clusterR: no_cores <- parallel::detectCores() -1 raster::beginCluster(no_cores) ?????? res <- raster::clusterR(inp, raster::stackApply, args = list(indices=c(2,2,3,3,1,1),fun = mean)) raster::endCluster() And the result is: > res...
Thank you, I did a Pull Request. ???? ??????, 28 ????????? 2019, 01:25:38 ?.?. EET, ? ??????? Roger Bivand <roger.bivand at nhh.no> ??????: On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Leonidas Liakos via R-sig-Geo wrote: > Thank you for your help! > > I tried to...
This is not a reasonable solution. It is not efficient to run stackapply twice to get the right names. Each execution can take hours. ???? 20/11/2019 3:30 ?.?., ? Frederico Faleiro ??????: > Hi Leonidas, > > both results are in the same order...
Thank you for your help! I tried to fix stackApply according to your instructions. Now the indices of names are the same and consistent with indices enumeration (gist for validation and tests: https://gist.github.com/kokkytos/93f315a5ecf59c0b183f9788754bc170). I've...
I added raster::zApply in my tests to validate the results. However, the indices of the names of the results are different now. Recall that the goal is to calculate from a raster stack time series the mean per day...
Why do they seem logical since they do not match? Check for example index 1 (Sunday). The results are different for the three processes > stackapply_mean class????? : RasterBrick dimensions : 300, 300, 90000, 7? (nrow, ncol, ncell, nlayers) resolution : 500, 500...
Thank you! The problem is not with the resulting values ??but with the index mapping. Values ??are correct in all three cases. As I wrote in a previous post in the thread (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo...
Ok, I think it's a bug and I'd like your help to confirm this. When the x parameter (a raster stack in this case) of stackApply is quite heavy, then the result of the stackApply is written to...
Thank you Jon! In fact, that's how I thought it worked. And that's how it worked for me all the time! But recently, doing some manual checks on some indices I couldn't confirm it ... I tried to...
Unfortunately the names are not always in ascending order. This is the result of my data. names????? : index_4, index_5, index_6, index_7, index_1, index_2, index_3 min values :?????? 3,?????? 3,?????? 3,?????? 3,?????? 3,?????? 3,?????? 3...
Can't find what you're looking for? Try searching with Google .