[Bioc-devel] Package name
For CRAN packages it's easy. Packages on CRAN are eternal. They may be archived, but they are never removed, so in a sense they're always "currently on CRAN". Archived packages may still be installed, but only with some efforts of the user. Some packages go in an out of "archived" status depending how quick the maintainer fixes issues. Because of this, I cannot really see how a CRAN package name can be "reused" by anyone else without a formal handover agreement between old and new maintainers. Even so, I think CRAN needs to approve on the "update" in order to unarchive it. Personally, I'd argue the same should apply to Bioconductor packages. Reusing package names for other purposes/different APIs is just asking for troubles, e.g. when it comes to future scientists trying to reproduce legacy results. /Henrik
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021, 03:02 Wolfgang Huber <wolfgang.huber at embl.org> wrote:
This is probably a niche concern, but I?d find it a pity if a good package name (*) became unavailable forever, esp. if it refers to a real-world concept not owned by the authors of the original package. Perhaps we could allow re-using a name after a grace period (say 1 or 2 years)? To be extra safe, one could also require the first version number of the new package be much higher than the last version of the old (dead) package. (*) One example I have in mind where we re-used the name of an extinct project is rhdf5. Kind regards Wolfgang
Il giorno 21ott2021, alle ore 13:39, Kern, Lori
<Lori.Shepherd at RoswellPark.org> ha scritto:
Good point. I'll open an issue on the github to fix. Lori Shepherd Bioconductor Core Team Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics Elm & Carlton Streets Buffalo, New York 14263
________________________________ From: Bioc-devel <bioc-devel-bounces at r-project.org> on behalf of
Laurent Gatto <laurent.gatto at uclouvain.be>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 12:53 AM To: bioc-devel at r-project.org <bioc-devel at r-project.org> Subject: [Bioc-devel] Package name The Package Guidelines for Developers and Reviewers say that: A package name should be descriptive and should not already exist as a
current package (case-insensitive) in Bioconductor nor CRAN.
The sentences says current packages - does that imply that names of
packages that have been archived (on CRAN) or deprecated (on Bioconductor) are available? This is likely to lead to serious confusion.
Laurent
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel