Hi, I got an email yesterday alerting me of the error in the build in the new BioC release. Upon looking into the error further I found out that the error is occurring because a dependency 'msa' package is not being built in the new release likely due to some issues with the C++ compiler (just guessing here). Can you please advice on next steps? Is there anything I need to do here? Thanks for your help, Pooja
[Bioc-devel] surfaltr build on Bioc 3.17 error advice
6 messages · Pooja Gangras, Hervé Pagès
Hi Pooja, Generally speaking there are 3 things you can do when a dep breaks your package: 1. Consider getting rid of that dep. 2. Contact the author/maintainers of the dep to let them know about the problem. If you can suggest a fix (e.g. by sending a PR on GitHub), that's even better, as I'm sure it will help get the issue resolved more quickly. 3. Do nothing and hope that the dep will get fixed in time for the 3.17 release (scheduled for end of April, see our release schedule here https://bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/ for the details). But that's risky ;-) In the case of msa's compilation error, it seems to be due to the R developers switching to the C++17 compiler by default for C++ package code in recent version of R devel (4.3 series). This is documented in the R devel NEWS file here: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/NEWS.html Note that BioC 3.16 is based on R 4.2 which uses the C++14 compiler by default for C++ package code. Therefore, in BioC 3.16, msa compiles fine on all platforms: https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.16/bioc-LATEST/msa/ So one option for the msa folks is to stick to the C++14 compiler by adding C++14 to they 'SystemRequirements' field. Although I don't know how that would play with Rcpp which gets compiled with the C++17 compiler, and which they depend on. So maybe that's a little bit risky? Maybe something to check with the Rcpp experts. Best, H.
On 21/03/2023 09:18, Pooja Gangras wrote:
Hi, I got an email yesterday alerting me of the error in the build in the new BioC release. Upon looking into the error further I found out that the error is occurring because a dependency 'msa' package is not being built in the new release likely due to some issues with the C++ compiler (just guessing here). Can you please advice on next steps? Is there anything I need to do here? Thanks for your help, Pooja [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Herv? Pag?s Bioconductor Core Team hpages.on.github at gmail.com
Hi Herve, Thank you for the quick response. So what surprises me is that msa was compiling and building just fine on the devel branch until now. And hence so was surfaltr, without any errors. There was a warning in surfaltr which one can see on the 3.16 release, I had fixed it in the devel branch. For some reason I was not able to push changes to the existing 3.16 release branch. I will go ahead and contact the maintainer for msa but hoping that it will fix itself before release because it was just fine until yesterday. Thanks, Pooja On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 2:43 PM Herv? Pag?s <hpages.on.github at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Pooja, Generally speaking there are 3 things you can do when a dep breaks your package: 1. Consider getting rid of that dep. 2. Contact the author/maintainers of the dep to let them know about the problem. If you can suggest a fix (e.g. by sending a PR on GitHub), that's even better, as I'm sure it will help get the issue resolved more quickly. 3. Do nothing and hope that the dep will get fixed in time for the 3.17 release (scheduled for end of April, see our release schedule here https://bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/ for the details). But that's risky ;-) In the case of msa's compilation error, it seems to be due to the R developers switching to the C++17 compiler by default for C++ package code in recent version of R devel (4.3 series). This is documented in the R devel NEWS file here: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/NEWS.html Note that BioC 3.16 is based on R 4.2 which uses the C++14 compiler by default for C++ package code. Therefore, in BioC 3.16, msa compiles fine on all platforms: https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.16/bioc-LATEST/msa/ So one option for the msa folks is to stick to the C++14 compiler by adding C++14 to they 'SystemRequirements' field. Although I don't know how that would play with Rcpp which gets compiled with the C++17 compiler, and which they depend on. So maybe that's a little bit risky? Maybe something to check with the Rcpp experts. Best, H. On 21/03/2023 09:18, Pooja Gangras wrote:
Hi, I got an email yesterday alerting me of the error in the build in the new BioC release. Upon looking into the error further I found out that the error is occurring because a dependency 'msa' package is not being built
in
the new release likely due to some issues with the C++ compiler (just
guessing here).
Can you please advice on next steps? Is there anything I need to do here?
Thanks for your help,
Pooja
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
-- Herv? Pag?s Bioconductor Core Team hpages.on.github at gmail.com
On 21/03/2023 12:48, Pooja Gangras wrote:
Hi Herve, Thank you for the?quick response. So what surprises me is that msa was compiling and building just fine on the devel branch until now.
As I said, the switch from C++14 to C++17 happened not too long ago in the devel version of R. And since we recently updated R on the BioC 3.17 builders to the most recent R devel, that switch is now reflected on the 3.17 builds.
And hence so was surfaltr, without any errors. There was a warning in surfaltr which one can see on the 3.16 release, I had fixed it in the devel branch. For some reason I was not able to push changes to the existing 3.16 release branch.
That's a separate issue but if you provide more details about how you tried to do this and what happened, maybe someone on this list will be able to help.
I will go ahead and contact the maintainer for msa but hoping that it will fix itself before release because it was just fine until yesterday.
Unfortunately it won't fix itself. H.
Thanks,
Pooja
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 2:43 PM Herv? Pag?s <hpages.on.github at gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Pooja,
Generally speaking there are 3 things you can do when a dep breaks
your
package:
1. Consider getting rid of that dep.
2. Contact the author/maintainers of the dep to let them know
about the
problem. If you can suggest a fix (e.g. by sending a PR on GitHub),
that's even better, as I'm sure it will help get the issue
resolved more
quickly.
3. Do nothing and hope that the dep will get fixed in time for the
3.17
release (scheduled for end of April, see our release schedule here
https://bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/ for the
details).
But that's risky ;-)
In the case of msa's compilation error, it seems to be due to the R
developers switching to the C++17 compiler by default for C++ package
code in recent version of R devel (4.3 series). This is documented in
the R devel NEWS file here:
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/NEWS.html
Note that BioC 3.16 is based on R 4.2 which uses the C++14
compiler by
default for C++ package code. Therefore, in BioC 3.16, msa
compiles fine
on all platforms:
https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.16/bioc-LATEST/msa/
So one option for the msa folks is to stick to the C++14 compiler by
adding C++14 to they 'SystemRequirements' field. Although I don't
know
how that would play with Rcpp which gets compiled with the C++17
compiler, and which they depend on. So maybe that's a little bit
risky?
Maybe something to check with the Rcpp experts.
Best,
H.
On 21/03/2023 09:18, Pooja Gangras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got an email yesterday alerting me of the error in the build
in the new
> BioC release. Upon looking into the error further I found out
that the
> error is occurring because a dependency 'msa' package is not
being built in
> the new release likely due to some issues with the C++ compiler
(just
> guessing here).
>
> Can you please advice on next steps? Is there anything I need to
do here?
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Pooja
>
>? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
--
Herv? Pag?s
Bioconductor Core Team
hpages.on.github at gmail.com
Herv? Pag?s Bioconductor Core Team hpages.on.github at gmail.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2 days later
Hi Herv?, I reached out to Ulrich who is the maintainer for msa package. He found your suggestions very helpful and used the option 2 you suggested to fix the error. Looks like the changes he made have fixed everything on windows and Linux platforms but the macOS platform is still showing an error message. http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/msa/merida1-buildsrc.html Any ideas on how to fix this? Thank you so much for all your help!! Pooja On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 4:50 PM Herv? Pag?s <hpages.on.github at gmail.com> wrote:
On 21/03/2023 12:48, Pooja Gangras wrote: Hi Herve, Thank you for the quick response. So what surprises me is that msa was compiling and building just fine on the devel branch until now. As I said, the switch from C++14 to C++17 happened not too long ago in the devel version of R. And since we recently updated R on the BioC 3.17 builders to the most recent R devel, that switch is now reflected on the 3.17 builds. And hence so was surfaltr, without any errors. There was a warning in surfaltr which one can see on the 3.16 release, I had fixed it in the devel branch. For some reason I was not able to push changes to the existing 3.16 release branch. That's a separate issue but if you provide more details about how you tried to do this and what happened, maybe someone on this list will be able to help. I will go ahead and contact the maintainer for msa but hoping that it will fix itself before release because it was just fine until yesterday. Unfortunately it won't fix itself. H. Thanks, Pooja On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 2:43 PM Herv? Pag?s <hpages.on.github at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Pooja, Generally speaking there are 3 things you can do when a dep breaks your package: 1. Consider getting rid of that dep. 2. Contact the author/maintainers of the dep to let them know about the problem. If you can suggest a fix (e.g. by sending a PR on GitHub), that's even better, as I'm sure it will help get the issue resolved more quickly. 3. Do nothing and hope that the dep will get fixed in time for the 3.17 release (scheduled for end of April, see our release schedule here https://bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/ for the details). But that's risky ;-) In the case of msa's compilation error, it seems to be due to the R developers switching to the C++17 compiler by default for C++ package code in recent version of R devel (4.3 series). This is documented in the R devel NEWS file here: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/NEWS.html Note that BioC 3.16 is based on R 4.2 which uses the C++14 compiler by default for C++ package code. Therefore, in BioC 3.16, msa compiles fine on all platforms: https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.16/bioc-LATEST/msa/ So one option for the msa folks is to stick to the C++14 compiler by adding C++14 to they 'SystemRequirements' field. Although I don't know how that would play with Rcpp which gets compiled with the C++17 compiler, and which they depend on. So maybe that's a little bit risky? Maybe something to check with the Rcpp experts. Best, H. On 21/03/2023 09:18, Pooja Gangras wrote:
Hi, I got an email yesterday alerting me of the error in the build in the
new
BioC release. Upon looking into the error further I found out that the error is occurring because a dependency 'msa' package is not being
built in
the new release likely due to some issues with the C++ compiler (just guessing here). Can you please advice on next steps? Is there anything I need to do
here?
Thanks for your help,
Pooja
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
-- Herv? Pag?s Bioconductor Core Team hpages.on.github at gmail.com --
Herv? Pag?s Bioconductor Core Teamhpages.on.github at gmail.com
Hi Pooja, Looks like std::auto_ptr is no longer valid in C++17: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69116001/how-do-i-re-enable-c17-removed-features-in-clang Weird thing is that the compiler is invoked with -std=gnu++17 on all platforms but compilation of msa only fails on Mac. It looks like using -D_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_FEATURES instead of -D_HAS_AUTO_PTR_ETC=1 in msa/src/ClustalW/msaMakefile solves the "no template named 'auto_ptr'" problem, but then compilation fails later with: ? fileInput/FileParser.cpp:56:5: error: ISO C++17 does not allow 'register' ? ?? ?? storage class specifier [-Wregister] ? ? ? register int i; ? ? ? ^~~~~~~~~ which is easy enough to fix by just removing the few occurrences of the 'register' keyword in ClustalW source code. With these small adjustments I manage to have the embedded ClustalW to compile on merida1. I don't know about the embedded ClustalOmega and Muscle though, they might need some similar adjustments too. Best, H.
On 24/03/2023 08:26, Pooja Gangras wrote:
Hi Herv?, I reached out to Ulrich who is the maintainer for msa package. He found your suggestions very helpful and used the option 2 you suggested to fix the error. Looks like the changes he made have fixed everything on windows and Linux platforms but the macOS platform is still showing an error message. http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/msa/merida1-buildsrc.html Any ideas on how to fix this? Thank you so much for all your help!! Pooja On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 4:50 PM Herv? Pag?s <hpages.on.github at gmail.com> wrote: On 21/03/2023 12:48, Pooja Gangras wrote:
Hi Herve,
Thank you for the?quick response.
So what surprises me is that msa was compiling and building just
fine on the devel branch until now.
As I said, the switch from C++14 to C++17 happened not too long
ago in the devel version of R. And since we recently updated R on
the BioC 3.17 builders to the most recent R devel, that switch is
now reflected on the 3.17 builds.
And hence so was surfaltr, without any errors. There was a
warning in surfaltr which one can see on the 3.16 release, I had
fixed it in the devel branch. For some reason I was not able to
push changes to the existing 3.16 release branch.
That's a separate issue but if you provide more details about how
you tried to do this and what happened, maybe someone on this list
will be able to help.
I will go ahead and contact the maintainer for msa but hoping
that it will fix itself before release because it was just fine
until yesterday.
Unfortunately it won't fix itself.
H.
Thanks,
Pooja
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 2:43 PM Herv? Pag?s
<hpages.on.github at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Pooja,
Generally speaking there are 3 things you can do when a dep
breaks your
package:
1. Consider getting rid of that dep.
2. Contact the author/maintainers of the dep to let them know
about the
problem. If you can suggest a fix (e.g. by sending a PR on
GitHub),
that's even better, as I'm sure it will help get the issue
resolved more
quickly.
3. Do nothing and hope that the dep will get fixed in time
for the 3.17
release (scheduled for end of April, see our release schedule
here
https://bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/ for the
details).
But that's risky ;-)
In the case of msa's compilation error, it seems to be due to
the R
developers switching to the C++17 compiler by default for C++
package
code in recent version of R devel (4.3 series). This is
documented in
the R devel NEWS file here:
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/NEWS.html
Note that BioC 3.16 is based on R 4.2 which uses the C++14
compiler by
default for C++ package code. Therefore, in BioC 3.16, msa
compiles fine
on all platforms:
https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.16/bioc-LATEST/msa/
So one option for the msa folks is to stick to the C++14
compiler by
adding C++14 to they 'SystemRequirements' field. Although I
don't know
how that would play with Rcpp which gets compiled with the C++17
compiler, and which they depend on. So maybe that's a little
bit risky?
Maybe something to check with the Rcpp experts.
Best,
H.
On 21/03/2023 09:18, Pooja Gangras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got an email yesterday alerting me of the error in the
build in the new
> BioC release. Upon looking into the error further I found
out that the
> error is occurring because a dependency 'msa' package is
not being built in
> the new release likely due to some issues with the C++
compiler (just
> guessing here).
>
> Can you please advice on next steps? Is there anything I
need to do here?
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Pooja
>
>? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
--
Herv? Pag?s
Bioconductor Core Team
hpages.on.github at gmail.com
--
Herv? Pag?s
Bioconductor Core Team
hpages.on.github at gmail.com
Herv? Pag?s Bioconductor Core Team hpages.on.github at gmail.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]