Inconsistent documentation in Writing R Extensions (PR#13878)

Greetings,

I think there is an inconsistency in the Writing R Extensions document.
Please let me know if I am right or wrong on this one.

Working from the PDF document (R-exts-2.9.1.pdf)

 - page 9 states that the file <pkg>-Ex.Rout.save should be placed in
tests/Examples in order to check against the current set of examples.
 - page 17 (item 16) states that the file <pkg>-Ex-Rout.save should be
placed in tests/Examples.

I have checked in one of my packages, and I believe the first case
<pkg>-Ex.Rout.save is correct.  Is this true?
Yes.
cheers...

Brandon

-----------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
-----------------------------------------------------------

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595