wilcox.exact function (PR#8856)
pat.hodgson at sympatico.ca writes:
Full_Name: Patrick Hodgson Version: 2.0 OS: solaris 2.9 Submission from: (NULL) (65.94.128.161) The value reported for the parameter W in the function wilcox.exact appears to be incorrect. I have checked the reference in the help file for this function (Myles & Hollander 1973, as well as 2nd ed. 1999 by same authors) and it is clear that W is the sum of the ranks of the data set with the smaller number of members.
You should not use the bug repository to report on a (non-core) package. However, it is the same W used by wilcox.test and help(wilcox.test) has the explanation.
Here is sample input/output:
x<-c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) y<-c(11,12,13,14,15) library(exactRankTests) wil<-wilcox.exact(x,y) wil
Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test
data: x and y
W = 0, p-value = 0.000666
alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0
In this case W should be the sum of the ranks of y (coincidentally also the
values of the y data)= 11+12+13+14+15 = 65.
W of zero is ridiculous.
Similarly, in this case W should be 2+4+6+8 = 20, not 10 as reported.
x<-c(1,3,5,7,9) y<-c(2,4,6,8) wil<-wilcox.exact(x,y) wil
Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test
data: x and y
W = 10, p-value = 1
alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0
______________________________________________ R-devel at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ?ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907