[FORGED] Newbie Question on R versus Matlab/Octave versus C
On 1/28/2019 7:51 PM, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
If you forge on with your preconceptions of how such a simulation should be implemented then you will be able to reproduce your failure just as spectacularly using R as you did using Octave.
I think I've come to the same conclusion. :-)
It is crucial to employ vectorization of your algorithms if you want good performance with either Octave or R. That vectorization may either be over time or over separate simulations.
Please explain further, if you don't mind. My background is not in programming, but in analog microchip circuit design (I'm now retired). Thus I'm a user of circuit simulators, not a programmer of them. Also, I'm running this stuff on my home computers, either Linux or Windows machines.
I am running simulations of a million cases of power plant performance over 25 years in about a minute. I know someone who used R to simulate a CFD river flow problem in a class in a few minutes, while others using Fortran or Matlab were struggling to get comparable runs completed in many hours. I believe the difference was in how the data were structured and manipulated more than the language that was being used. I think the strong capabilities for presenting results using R makes using it advantageous over Octave, though.
After my failed attempt at using Octave, I realized that most likely the
main contributing factor was that I was not able to figure out an
efficient data structure to model one person. But C lent itself
perfectly to my idea of how to go about programming my simulation. So
here's a simplified pseudocode sort of example of what I did:
To model a single reproducing woman I used this C construct:
typedef struct woman {
int isAlive;
int isPregnant;
double age;
. . .
} WOMAN;
Then I allocated memory for a big array of these things, using the C
malloc() function, which gave me the equivalent of this statement:
WOMAN women[NWOMEN]; /* An array of NWOMEN woman-structs */
After some initialization I set up two loops:
for( j=0; j<numberOfYears; j++) {
for(i=1; i< numberOfWomen; i++) {
updateWomen();
}
}
The function updateWomen() figures out things like whether the woman
becomes pregnant or gives birth on a given day, dies, etc.
I added other refinements that are not relevant here, such as random
variations of various parameters, using the GNU Scientific Library
random number generator functions.
If you can suggest a data construct in R or Octave that does something
like this, and uses your idea of vectorization, I'd like to hear it. I'd
like to implement it and compare results with my C implementation.
If your problems truly need a compiled language, the Rcpp package lets you mix C++ with R quite easily and then you get the best of both worlds. (C and Fortran are supported, but they are a bit more finicky to setup than C++).
I don't know the answer to that, but perhaps you can help decide. Alan
On January 28, 2019 4:00:07 PM PST, Alan Feuerbacher <alanf00 at comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/28/2019 4:20 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 1/29/19 10:05 AM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
Hi, I recently learned of the existence of R through a physicist friend who uses it in his research. I've used Octave for a decade, and C
for
35 years, but would like to learn R. These all have advantages and disadvantages for certain tasks, but as I'm new to R I hardly know
how
to evaluate them. Any suggestions?
* C is fast, but with a syntax that is (to my mind) virtually ? incomprehensible.? (You probably think differently about this.)
I've been doing it long enough that I have little problem with it, except for pointers. :-)
* In C, you essentially have to roll your own for all tasks; in R, ? practically anything (well ...) that you want to do has already ? been programmed up.? CRAN is a wonderful resource, and there's
more
? on github. * The syntax of R meshes beautifully with *my* thought patterns;
YMMV.
* Why not just bog in and try R out?? It's free, it's readily
available,
? and there are a number of good online tutorials.
I just installed R on my Linux Fedora system, so I'll do that. I wonder if you'd care to comment on my little project that prompted this? As part of another project, I wanted to model population growth starting from a handful of starting individuals. This is exponential in the long run, of course, but I wanted to see how a few basic parameters affected the outcome. Using Octave, I modeled a single person as a "cell", which in Octave has a good deal of overhead. The program basically looped over the entire population, and updated each person according to the parameters, which included random statistical variations. So when the total population reached, say 10,000, and an update time of 1 day, the program had to execute 10,000 x 365 update operations for each year of growth. For large populations, say 100,000, the program did not return even after 24 hours of run time. So I switched to C, and used its "struct" declaration and an array of structs to model the population. This allowed the program to complete in under a minute as opposed to 24 hours+. So in line with your comments, C is far more efficient than Octave. How do you think R would fare in this simulation? Alan --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.