[FORGED] Newbie Question on R versus Matlab/Octave versus C
This would be a suitable application for NetLogo. The R package RNetLogo provides an interface. In a few lines of code you get a simulation with graphics.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 7:00 PM Alan Feuerbacher <alanf00 at comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/28/2019 4:20 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 1/29/19 10:05 AM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
Hi, I recently learned of the existence of R through a physicist friend who uses it in his research. I've used Octave for a decade, and C for 35 years, but would like to learn R. These all have advantages and disadvantages for certain tasks, but as I'm new to R I hardly know how to evaluate them. Any suggestions?
* C is fast, but with a syntax that is (to my mind) virtually incomprehensible. (You probably think differently about this.)
I've been doing it long enough that I have little problem with it, except for pointers. :-)
* In C, you essentially have to roll your own for all tasks; in R, practically anything (well ...) that you want to do has already been programmed up. CRAN is a wonderful resource, and there's more on github. > * The syntax of R meshes beautifully with *my* thought patterns; YMMV. * Why not just bog in and try R out? It's free, it's readily available, and there are a number of good online tutorials.
I just installed R on my Linux Fedora system, so I'll do that. I wonder if you'd care to comment on my little project that prompted this? As part of another project, I wanted to model population growth starting from a handful of starting individuals. This is exponential in the long run, of course, but I wanted to see how a few basic parameters affected the outcome. Using Octave, I modeled a single person as a "cell", which in Octave has a good deal of overhead. The program basically looped over the entire population, and updated each person according to the parameters, which included random statistical variations. So when the total population reached, say 10,000, and an update time of 1 day, the program had to execute 10,000 x 365 update operations for each year of growth. For large populations, say 100,000, the program did not return even after 24 hours of run time. So I switched to C, and used its "struct" declaration and an array of structs to model the population. This allowed the program to complete in under a minute as opposed to 24 hours+. So in line with your comments, C is far more efficient than Octave. How do you think R would fare in this simulation? Alan --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
______________________________________________ R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Statistics & Software Consulting GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc. tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com