Skip to content
Prev 10336 / 20628 Next

glmer with nAGQ > 1

Viechtbauer Wolfgang (STAT <wolfgang.viechtbauer at ...> writes:
It's probably a "foreseeable future" decision (alas).

   I don't know the guts of the AGQ calculation tremendously well,
so I don't know exactly what would be involved in constructing
a multi-dimensional AGQ.  Taking a brief look back at lme4.0/old-lme4,
it seems that only a single _grouping variable_ was allowed, but 
it was not limited to scalar random effects terms, so it might
not be too horrible to re-implement ... but it's not on the
urgent "to do" list at the moment ...  (Anyone want to volunteer
to take a look at the code and implement this ???)

  Ben