Skip to content
Prev 10350 / 20628 Next

glmer with nAGQ > 1

Thanks for the reply. I wasn't aware of the fact that lme4.0/old-lme4 only allowed one grouping variable with nAGQ > 1, but I just tried that out and that is indeed the case. My more pressing concern with the new lme4 however is the possibility of allowing for nonscalar random effects terms. I frequently fit logistic regression models with multiple random effects (like a random intercept for individuals/clusters and a random effect on a dummy variable to allow for variable treatment effects). It would be great to still benefit from the increased accuracy of nAGQ > 1 then. It would be nice if that could be put on the to-do list, but I know from personal experience how those to-do lists have a tendency just to get longer than shorter over time.

Best,
Wolfgang